![]() ![]() Most trivial uses of sockets get by with a small number of slightly opaque but common enough pieces of "copy/paste programming" that most readers will understand roughly what's going on in the code others are involved enough that they do require full access to, and understanding of, the underlying facility. It is unclear whether it would serve any useful purpose, though. ![]() You could very well create a more pythonic replacement for the Python socket module with proper encapsulation of the underlying facilities. Most of them will require some familiarity with C, which may be a bit of a distraction (but understanding the basics of C is probably also a good investment of your time if you expect to be spending more of it reading and writing code). If you really want to understand sockets, there are many excellent introductions to the topic. They expose many of the idiosyncrasies of the underlying OS facilities, and you have to be familiar with the underlying system to properly understand their semantics. Many of the Python standard libraries are fairly thin wrappers around the underlying system libraries. They have their uses but when they are appropriate is a judgement decision. There are other ways to use import: you can restrict importing only certain names and you can create aliases, but you should learn more about programming before using them. You can get away with it in a small program but you would be taking a risk - over time programs only ever get bigger and more complicated, they never get smaller and simpler. Unfortunately you will see from module import * quite a lot because people are lazy. If we want we can use all three in the same program, but we must specify the namespace first. So we know that socket.socket comes from the socket module, and not from some module describing car tools or one concerning electrical circuits. ![]() Regular price 323.09 USD Sale price 323.09 USD Regular price 358.99 USD Unit price / per. What if two modules happen to both use the same name, for example closedown? The last one defined is the one which will be used - there will be no warning that one has masked the other because python is designed to be dynamic. 48 Piece 1/4' Drive 6 Pt Std and Deep SAE & Metric Socket Set. The other reason is namespace collisions. One is that we can't easily determine where something comes from - the code you show is quite short and not typical. We can arrange it so we import names into our own namespace and don't need to specify the module name, which is what you asked for: from socket import *īut that's dangerous for a couple of reasons and is called namespace pollution. If we omit the namespace then it assumes the current one, which in a simple single file program is called _main_. So socket.socket means the socket name (which happens to be a function) from the socket module - the module name comes first then the function name. A module (for example, socket) has its own namespace. Key Video Moments 00:00:05 - Why a Cineworld purchase makes sense 00:01:18 - Pachter explains case for a downgrade on Amazon.Object names reside in a namespace - a space containing names. In the video above, Yahoo Finance’s Dave Briggs and Seana Smith discuss the potential purchase with Pachter. Given the bankruptcy, Cineworld’s screens could sell for roughly $600 million less than an AMC screen and therefore would be a significantly better purchase. The analyst points to Cineworld (CINE.L), which filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, as a better potential target for Amazon. And even if AMC did want to sell itself, Amazon could find a more attractive option anyway, according to Pachter. Shares of AMC spiked more than 15% on the news Tuesday, before Pachter and Wedbush wrote to clients the deal was “unlikely.” Pachter highlights there’s been no indication that AMC wants to sell itself as one of the key reasons the deal is unlikely. Speculation spread on Tuesday of a potential bid from the tech giant after a substack post from The Intersect. Yahoo Finance Video Why Amazon buying AMC doesn't make sense, analyst arguesĪmazon (AMZN) buying AMC (AMC) would be a huge mistake, according to one Wall Street analyst.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |